- According to the Institut de la statistique du Québec, 12.7% of Quebec businesses used AI for production purposes in the 12 months before Q2 2025.
- Traditional AI predicts, classifies and optimizes from company data; generative AI creates new content from pre-trained models (PlanAxion, 2026).
- According to McKinsey (2025), 51% of organizations using AI have experienced at least one negative consequence, inaccuracy being the most common.
- Three implementation paths exist: buy a ready-made solution, adapt an existing model, or build a custom one (PlanAxion, 2026).
Your controller wants a tool that predicts which customers will pay late. Your marketing director wants an assistant that drafts the newsletter. Both say “AI”, but they are asking for two different technologies. The confusion is expensive: companies buy a generative AI licence for a prediction problem, or the reverse.
Market figures cited here come from public surveys (McKinsey, Institut de la statistique du Québec) and describe trends, not your specific situation.
According to the Institut de la statistique du Québec, 12.7% of Quebec businesses used AI applications for production purposes in the 12 months before the second quarter of 2025, and text analysis was the most used type of AI (56.7% of mentions).
Traditional AI vs generative AI: what is the fundamental difference?
Traditional AI learns from your data to predict, classify and optimize, while generative AI produces new content (text, code, images) from models already trained on massive corpora. The first answers “what will happen?”. The second answers “write this for me”.
Traditional AI covers predictive analytics, customer segmentation and recommendation systems. It starts from your existing digital data and demands serious engineering: cleansing, modelling, validation. Without clean data, it is worthless.
Generative AI has already learned patterns from human language, computer code, images and even music. It is usable on day one, with a few sentences of instruction (prompt engineering). An administrative assistant in Trois-Rivières can use it the same afternoon, with no data science team.
What value does generative AI deliver that traditional AI does not?
Generative AI opens two levers that traditional AI generally does not: new revenue through the creation of products and content, and cost reductions through the automation of creative and writing tasks. Both approaches improve revenue and costs, but not through the same mechanisms.
On the revenue side: product innovation (features and services that were impossible before) and automated creativity in marketing, design and advertising. On the cost side: producing reports, meeting summaries and emails, customer support through chatbots, and faster R&D through generated concepts and prototypes.
The benchmarks worth remembering:
- According to McKinsey's State of AI 2026 survey, nearly nine in ten organizations use AI in at least one business function, but only 44% are scaling it across the enterprise.
- Also according to McKinsey (2026), 37% of respondents attribute some EBIT impact to AI, and only 6% qualify as AI high performers.
- According to the ISQ (2025), 26.1% of Quebec businesses with 100 or more employees use AI, compared with 12.2% of businesses with 1 to 4 employees.
- According to the ISQ (2025), finance and insurance, the information industry and professional services show usage rates of 36.9% to 55.0%, against 2.3% in construction.
The message is clear: adoption is broad, measurable value is still rare. The difference comes from picking the right type of AI for the right problem, then redesigning the process around the tool.
How do you implement generative AI: buy, adapt or build?
A business implements generative AI through one of three paths: buying a ready-made solution, adapting an existing model with its own data, or building a custom model. Each path trades speed for control.
1. Buy a ready-made solution. ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini work from day one and cost little. They offer limited customization but remain accessible to non-technical staff. The catch: your competitors can access them just as easily. A tool your competitors can buy tomorrow morning is not a competitive advantage, it is the price of admission.
2. Adapt an existing model. Major providers offer models you can integrate into your systems and enrich with your data and intellectual property. This is where a real advantage gets built: the model knows your products, your contracts and your vocabulary, and you control its outputs more tightly.
3. Build from scratch. The highest level of customization, and the most expensive in time, expertise and capital. This path remains reserved for large organizations. For most Quebec SMEs it is impractical, and that is fine.
Before choosing a path, identify the process to transform. Our guide on which business processes a Quebec SME should automate first offers a method for spotting high-volume, low-judgment tasks, where AI pays back fastest.
What risks does generative AI add compared with traditional AI?
Generative AI shares the privacy and security risks of traditional AI, but it adds one of its own: hallucinations, meaning false answers delivered with confidence. According to McKinsey's State of AI 2025 survey, 51% of organizations using AI have seen at least one negative consequence, and nearly one third of respondents report consequences stemming from inaccuracy.
On privacy, the key difference lies in consumer-grade tools: some free versions may retain and reuse what your employees type in. A customer contract pasted into a public chatbot can leave your perimeter. In Quebec, Law 25 requires an assessment process before any cloud processing of personal information, and generative AI is no exception.
On hallucinations, the rule is simple: no generative AI output goes to a customer, an auditor or a regulator without human review. Traditional AI gets things wrong too, but it produces a score or a class you can measure. Generative AI produces a convincing sentence, which is more dangerous.
Traditional AI that gets it wrong produces a wrong score; generative AI that gets it wrong produces a convincing sentence.
Where should a business start with AI?
Start by naming the business problem, then choose the type of AI that solves it: prediction and optimization for traditional AI, creation and writing for generative AI. A structured one-day workshop is often enough to sort a dozen ideas and keep two or three. Our article on the Rapid AI Solutions Workshop describes the format and what it produces.
Generative AI is a powerful evolution of traditional AI, not its replacement. The organizations extracting measurable value are those that chose the right implementation path, contained the risks and redesigned their processes around the tool.
Frequently asked questions
What is traditional AI?
Traditional AI refers to models trained on a company's existing data to predict, classify, recommend or optimize. It includes predictive analytics, customer segmentation and recommendation systems. It requires clean data and rigorous engineering, but it produces measurable outputs: a score, a probability, a class. It is the AI behind demand forecasts and fraud detection.
What is generative AI?
Generative AI refers to models that produce new content (text, code, images, audio) from patterns learned on massive corpora. ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini are examples. It works from day one through plain-language instructions, which makes it accessible to non-technical staff, but it can hallucinate and must be reviewed before external use.
Do you have to choose between traditional AI and generative AI?
No. They solve different problems and are often combined. A manufacturer can forecast stockouts with a traditional predictive model, then draft customer notices with generative AI. The useful question is not “which one?” but “which process has the most to gain, and with which type of AI?”. Start from the process, not the technology.
What is a hallucination in generative AI?
A hallucination is a false or logically wrong answer that the model states with confidence. According to McKinsey (2025), inaccuracy is the negative consequence most often reported by organizations using AI. The safeguard: systematic human review before any external release, and verified internal sources feeding the model rather than the open web.
Can you use ChatGPT with company data?
Yes, provided you choose a business edition that does not train its models on your data and you frame usage with an internal policy. In Quebec, Law 25 requires a privacy impact assessment before entrusting personal information to a cloud service. A free consumer account does not meet those requirements, whatever the convenience.
- Institut de la statistique du Québec, Adoption et utilisation de l’intelligence artificielle par les entreprises au Québec en 2024 et en 2025: 12.7% of Quebec businesses used AI for production purposes (Q2 2025), gaps by size and sector, text analysis as the dominant use.
- McKinsey, The state of AI in 2026: On the road to ROI: nearly nine in ten organizations use AI in at least one function, 44% are scaling it, 37% report an EBIT impact, 6% are high performers.
- McKinsey, The state of AI in 2025: Agents, innovation, and transformation: 88% of organizations use AI, 51% have experienced at least one negative consequence, inaccuracy being the most common.




